Saturday, 25 February 2017

February 25, 2017 0

"Moonlight", Movie Review

 

Barry Jenkins' vital portrait of a South Florida youth revisits the character at three stages in his life, offering rich insights into the contemporary African-American experience.

What does it mean to be Black in America today? That question, too big for any one film to answer, serves as the driving inquiry in Barry Jenkins’ “Moonlight,” a beautifully intimate character study that argues in no uncertain terms that the African-American identity is far too complex to be reduced to the flimsy stereotypes so often presented on-screen.

“Black” isn’t just a race, community, or color, but one of three names by which a sexually conflicted young South Florida man allows himself to be called in a film that’s ultimately about taking control of one’s own identity. That’s exactly what Jenkins himself is doing by delivering a film so firmly committed to capturing the black experience, resulting in a socially conscious work of art as essential as it is insightful. A natural extension of his garrulous San Francisco-set debut, “Medicine for Melancholy,” the director’s beautifully nuanced, subtext-rich second feature is no less intellectually engaged, but proves far more trusting in audiences’ ability to read between the lines.

Told in three chapters over the course of about 16 years, “Moonlight” (adapted from playwright Tarell Alvin McCraney’s short, poetically titled theater piece, “In Moonlight Black Boys Look Blue”) is one of the first post-“Boyhood” indies to take a serious look at a young man’s evolution over time — though Jenkins employs the traditional strategy of casting different actors to portray Chiron (whose name is pronounced like that of the former Israeli prime minister) and his peers at the different stages of their lives. The film begins with Chiron at age 10, picks up later in high school, and then skips forward to reveal the man he has become, thick-skinned and tough on the outside but still searching on the interior. “Moonlight” would have been ghettoized as a LGBTQ film had it been released a decade earlier, considering that dimension of his self-discovery. Today, no real category applies, and with any luck, this resonant film will connect with audiences in a more universal way.

Even before Chiron is old enough to understand the notion of homosexuality, his classmates seem to have labeled him as such. The other kids openly torment the runt-like child (played by Alex Hibbert at this stage), whom they call “Little” and dismiss as “soft,” chasing him to a local crack den, where he’s discovered by a sympathetic drug dealer named Juan (Mahershala Ali, breathing humanity into a stereotype). Since Little refuses to speak, Juan has no choice but to bring him back to the home he shares with his girlfriend Teresa (Janelle Monáe, a doll-like beauty with remarkable inner strength) — and in so doing, takes his place as a sort of surrogate father and role model.

Little’s actual home is a run-down townhouse he shares with his mother (Naomie Harris), an overworked nurse who eventually succumbs to the hollow escape of drugs. Informed by both Jenkins’ and McCraney’s own Miami upbringing, this environment may be gritty, but it’s not “Precious.” When he wants to take a warm bath, Little is obliged to heat the water on the stove and use dish soap for bubbles — just one of many details that lends texture to the portrait, which ditches the superficial faux-naturalism of turbulent handheld cinematography (à la “Beasts of the Southern Wild”) for seductive Steadicam lensing, reinforced by a vigorous gush of classical music (courtesy of composer Nicholas Britell) at regular intervals. “Moonlight” feels less like a young man’s troubled memories than a dream-like evocation of a specific time and place, which makes its leaps in time easier to accept.
Looking only vaguely like the actor who has played Little, Ashton Sanders assumes the role of Chiron in the movie’s middle portion, portraying him as a scrawny, introverted-looking 16-year-old. Some things have changed — Juan has disappeared from the picture, though there’s always a spare bed available at Teresa’s place, which is handy, considering how strung out Chiron’s crack-addicted mom is these days — but Chiron is as lonely as ever, and the bullies remain the same. Their taunts have taken on a more aggressively homophobic edge, though Chiron still lacks certainty about his own identity. In one of the film’s most delicate scenes, he finally takes the initiative to explore those urges, with his womanizing friend Kevin (Jharrel Jerome). It’s a revealing irony that his peers, who will themselves spend much of their lives battling with the prejudice of being pigeonholed as black men from the projects, are so quick to force one of their own into a subcategory.

“Moonlight” challenges easy stereotypes at every turn. Juan may be a drug dealer — he is even forced to confront his own ethics when he realizes that Chiron’s mother is one of his customers — but Jenkins’ depiction of the role drugs play in the black community is far more complex than we’re accustomed to seeing, and in the final segment, we’re surprised to discover Chiron’s own connection to the phenomenon. Yes, drugs destroy, but they also offer as escape, both to the users (temporarily disconnecting them from their everyday pressures) and those who sell them (offering financial independence and power).

The triptych’s final installment is set roughly a decade later. Chiron (Trevante Rhodes), now going by the nickname Kevin gave him back in school, Black, is completely unrecognizable, though it would be a mistake to spoil the specific ways in which he has changed. The important thing is that Chiron’s evolution is not yet complete, and while this last third introduces notes of tragedy as it reveals how the character has grappled with questions of his own masculinity, it provides Chiron with a series of choices that ultimately put him in control of his own future.

Tuesday, 29 November 2016

November 29, 2016 0

The Art Of Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, Expressionism


 

 

 

“The heaviest burden of all is the pressure of the war and the increasing superficiality. It gives me incessantly the impression of a bloody carnival. I feel as though the outcome is in the air and everything is topsy-turvy.. All the same, I keep on trying to get some order in my thoughts and to create a picture of the age out of confusion, which is after all my function."



Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, a German painter and Printmaker. He belonged to Expressionism as a modern artistic movement, in particular Die Brücke group “ The Bridge” which expanded in Dresden, Berlin before World War I. Kirchner’s personality is characterized by deep melancholy towards the modern world, and the lack of spirituality and authenticity. He voluntarily joined the military to fight in WWI, but he was released after several mental breakdowns, after the war he settled in Switzerland, he painted many landscapes there, and he got ill mentally from the horrors of the war. In 1938 he took his own life after the Nazis esteemed his art as degenerate and forced him to resign from the Berlin Academy of Art, and over than 600 of his pieces were destroyed, or detained.

Kirchner as an expressionist was interested in the human emotions. Expressionism, unlike - the former artistic movement -  Impressionism which was interested in portraying nature in a realistic representations, Is about communicating intense problematic emotions and feelings. Expressionism came as a reaction to the loss of spirituality and human relationships, it portrays the emptiness and vacant faces of people in a rapidly changing world. Artists, including Kirchner, felt increasingly alienated and ostracized, they searched in their depths for meaning, and inspiration, from their solitary gloomy hearts. Vivid colors, quirky distortion, and vigorous brushstrokes were the mean artists used to depict the modern world.

The first time I saw “The Street” by Kirchner, the effect of it never left me, first emotions I felt are still accessible to me. Kirchner’s Dresden scenes portray the isolation and anxiety he felt in the midst of impersonal city life. Everything about this image is jarring—the colors are harsh and clashing, the street has an unnatural slope, the pavement is crowded, and escape is blocked by a trolley car in the background. With its masklike, vacant faces and lonely figures, The Street perfectly embodies what Kirchner referred to as “agonizing restlessness”—the defining quality of so many Expressionist works.

November 29, 2016 0

Woman At Point Zero. Story of female destiny

             


                      “Let me speak. Do not interrupt me. I have no time to listen to you,”

 

 

The story of firdaus is a remarkable one, it represents the hardships women go through in Egypt as many middle Eastern countries and patriarchal societies. Firdaus’s storytelling is moving, heartfelt, and honest. A story of victim of capitalism, patriarchy and oppressive regime of Sadat.

Nawal Saadawi is an Egyptian Anarcho-feminist, doctor, novelist, and leftist revolutionary, if you want to know more about her ( click here ) .  Saadawi was conducting a study on the effects of prison on female prisoners when she came across Firdaus in Qanatir Prison. She heard of Firdaus from a doctor who believed that Firdaus is incapable of killing a man and thus unworthy of a death penalty. Firdaus refused to see anyone, she barely ate, but after repetitive appeals from Nawal to meet her, she finally agreed to tell her story a day before the judgment .

Firdaus’ struggle is to claim her body as her own. Since her childhood, decisions concerning her were never hers to take, her parents cut off her clitoris at a young age. Her uncle took her away when her parents died, and then he did whatever he pleased with her fragile body, eventually he forced her to marry a man so old when she was only 19 of age. Men in the street look at her as if her body existed only for them, to please them.

Firdaus comes from a poor family, she got to school and had a high school certificate, but she never made it to the university. First reason, her uncle was a man of religion, a scholar, and for him it was shameful to his honor to send his niece to a mixed university where she will be seated side by side to men. Second reason, her uncle saw her dowry could help him, and make him get rid of her. Firdaus wanted to finish her studies, she liked to read, it gave her room for imagining a bigger greater world where she can escape.

Women in the story all suffer from imprisonment, an invisible cage designed to trap women. All females that Firdaus encountered are living in illusions, weather it is marriage, work, religion, or respect. Firdaus did every role a woman is destined to do in a patriarchal society, she did the housewife, the daughter, the student, the worker, and the prostitute, and she came up with the conclusion that all of these only imprisoned her. All men in the story sought of Ferdaus as a territory made for them, her father to beat her, and everyone else to abuse her sexually, literally all men she met.

She was never expected to have an opinion on things, until she escaped the marriage. She was surprised and confused when she was asked weather she prefers oranges or tangerines. Nawal Saadawi took it that far to accentuate the extent women are not allowed to have a taste of their own, to not have a choice.

Firdaus embraces death. For her it is liberating, it is freeing. Death alone can save her from her misery, and her destiny of a woman. She believes that women whatsoever their class, or status are suppressed, are not free from male dominance, and she wants to escape her destiny.

I Believe that this is a must read for feminist from all over the world, it is relevant, poignant, and moving. The storyline is relatable for women from all regions of the world. Plus it is a short but powerful read.

Thursday, 3 November 2016

November 03, 2016 0

Nawal el Saadawi : Egyptian feminist, author, and acitivist.

 

 

 

“ I just wept, and called out to my mother for help. But the worst shock of all was when I looked around and found her standing by my side. Yes. It was her, I could not be mistaken, in flesh and blood, right in the midst of these strangers, talking to them and smiling at them as though they had not participated in slaughtering her daughter just a few minutes ago.”
 The Hidden Face of Eve, Nawal el Saadawi. 



Nawal el Saadawi is a medical doctor, Egyptian feminist, campaigner against Female Genital Mutilation, she has written fifty books in her lifetime and she was nominated for a Nobel Prize in Literature. she contributed a great deal in the revolution that took place in Egypt, she was surrounded by thousands of young revolutionaries, she shared her knowledge and wisdom with them. Her major characters are ordinary women, through her books she shock, question, and provoke. Nawal el Saadawi has liberated generations of women from the oppression or brainwash they were subjected to, not only in Egypt but throughout the Arab world.

Nawal el Saadawi was born in Cairo, Egypt in 1931, back in the days she was lucky enough to get educated, although her parents wanted to wed her at the age of ten but her mother stood out for her when she refused to get married, she was as all young girls back then circumcised, it is a very painful childhood memory for her. Nawal el Saadawi was good at school, she was acing her classes which allowed her to get into med school unlike her older brother who was lazy and spoiled. Nawal el Saadawi worked for the Egyptian Government as director General for Public Health Education, she also founded a magazine, “Health”, but she lost both of them in 1972 after her public statements and criticism of social norms, and the political regime of the president Sadat.

Nawal el Saadawi’s first book “Women and Sex” was censured, and attacked by fundamentalists and Egyptian society in general. The book brings to light two main topics, female genital mutilation, and   virginity. In the rural areas of Egypt FGM was performed in unsafe conditions which put thousands of young girl’s lives at risk,  in general Nawal el Saadawi expressed her anger and rage toward these inhumane and patriarchal traditions that women pay the price for every day, she cited scientific references concerning clitoris and condemned stripping women of their sexuality with the removal of the clitoris. Moreover, the book also discusses in great length the topic of virginity, which is in the East the thermometer of purity of girls, in Egypt and other Arab countries, girls can get killed if they were not virgins at their wedding night, it is considered to be  disgraceful to the honor of the family. Nawal el Saadawi challenged these traditions on a scientific basis, she shows in her books all kinds of hymns, and how some girls are born without virginity, while some of the others lose it not necessarily through sex since hymns are very fragile in nature, she also attacks these norms. Women And Sex was censured in Egypt, but students and intellectuals specially women found a way to smuggle it and read it secretly, it was a revolution or a turning point on how women perceive themselves, and how they reacted to patriarchal oppression in their environments.

  Nawal el Saadawi is very engaged politically. She was imprisoned,  exiled, and received death threats. She was imprisoned for three months for crimes against the state based on her outspoken political views and criticism, in these months she wrote a book on  a roll of toilet paper with a eyebrow pencil smuggled by a prostitute, the book was titled “Memoirs from the women’s prison”, in 1993 she fled to the US after series of death threats, and during the Arab spring she lived her dream, she said she had dreams of revolution since she was a kid and in 2011 she made the revolution happen along many many other intellectuals, a lot of young Egyptians used to gather around her to learn and debate with her; after the Arab spring a group of young women, most of them are big fans of her writings, founded sort of a book club in which they organize meetings to talk about her books in great length, and she never missed a meeting.

Nawal el Saadawi is called the “ the white demon” amongst fundamentalists. Nawal el Saadawi advocates secularism, specially in her book, “God Resigns in the Summit Meeting”. She believes that all religions, specially monotheistic religions, oppress women, and she considers the revival of Political Islam as a threat to what feminist has fought for in the middle east.

Regarding veil, she said that women don’t chose, it is imposed on them through a process of socialization, she believes that veil is offensive to women. “"What do we mean by choice? It is pressure, but it is hidden pressure – she is not aware of it. I was exposed to different pressures from my sisters. We are all the products of our economic, social and political life and our education. Young people today are living in the era of the fundamentalist groups."

Nawal el Saadawi was married three times, and she lives alone in an apartment in Cairo, not near from Maydan Tahrir. Regarding her first husband she said, “No, no, that’s the problem. My first husband was a great man, my colleague in the medical college. He was fascinating, and he was the father of my daughter. My father didn’t want me to marry him because he had gone to Suez to fight the British. But then [after Suez] the guerrilla fighters were betrayed, many of them imprisoned. This crisis broke him, and he became an addict. I was told that if I married him, he might stop his addictions, but he didn’t. He tried to kill me, so I left him.”.
about her second husband, “He was a man of law, very patriarchal.
I am not really fit for the role of a wife, you must be sure of that.”
Regarding her third husband whom she loved and lived with for long she wrote, “My third husband [Sherif Hatata], the father of my son, was a very free man, a Marxist who’d been imprisoned. I lived with him for 43 years, and I told everyone: this is the only feminist man on earth. And then I had to divorce him, too. He was a liar. He was having relations with other women. oh, the complexity of the patriarchal character. He wrote books about gender equality, and then he betrayed his wife. Ninety-five per cent of men are like that, I’m sure.”

Nawal el Saadawi was at the center of international attention last year after she was nominated for a Nobel Prize In Literature, but she had been invited to lecture in the US, England and Germany as well as other European and Arab countries, she was even offered asylum, but she refused. She insists on fulfilling her role as an intellectual in her beloved country, Egypt. She is a fighter, a brave women, and a radical activist.

The following article is an introductory insight on Nawal el Saadawi, and it is the beginning of a series of readings of Middle Eastern, North African and Arab Feminists and writers, next one is an analysis of Nawal el Saadawi’ s book “Women At Point Zero. Stay tuned.

Constructive criticism is highly welcomed. 

Tuesday, 1 November 2016

November 01, 2016 0

Beat Generation Impact On Moroccan Youth






  " I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked,
dragging themselves through the negro streets at dawn looking for an angry fix,
angelheaded hipsters burning for the ancient heavenly connection to the starry dynamo in the machinery of night,
who poverty and tatters and hollow-eyed and high sat up smoking in the supernatural darkness of cold-water flats floating across the tops of cities contemplating jazz,
who bared their brains to Heaven under the El and saw Mohammedan angels staggering on tenement roofs illuminated,
who passed through universities with radiant cool eyes hallucinating Arkansas and Blake-light tragedy among the scholars of war,
who were expelled from the academies for crazy & publishing obscene odes on the windows of the skull. " Howl, Allen Ginsberg



Two years ago I was quite depressed, I had been undergoing a rough breakup, my mood was very suicidal in away, nihilist to an extent until I discovered Allen Ginsberg and it was the best thing that ever happened to me. By the time I had an online friend ho had this middle-aged bearded man on his facebook cover picture, with a link to HOWL, I was raging with curiosity to discover more about the mysterious hippie, he looked so free, independent, and careless, my friend later on advised me to read Howl, the first time I was taken by the Jazzy Rhythm, later on while I was confiding my misery to my friend, he said that I should listen to the recorded Howl, and read it along out loud, and feel the words running through my veins.

Beat Generation or Beat Movement is the result of political, economic and literary frustration, it is a generation that sought liberation from all these constraints, and wanted to get rid of formal ways of dealing with poetry, they were politically engaged, and most of them were drop outs, or jobless. Beat stands for weary, and it also connotes a musical sense, a spiritual movement. Inclusiveness of the beat generation. Popular culture.

the beat generation relationship with the hippie movement. Basically, the hippies are the result of the beat generation, the term hip was first used by Allen Ginsberg, and Jack Kerouac. Also, both movements share the same values which are love, peace, and liberation. The hippies wanted to alienate themselves from the standard American way of living, and the protested by dropping out of society, by living in communal groups, or the cult of traveling or going into the wilderness. Actually wilderness represented the primitive, natural, and authentic way of living they felt they needed in order to feel spiritual and meaningful, on the hand one can easily notice the second hand store clothes, the unshaved beards and long haired males and females in addition to the spread of naturist culture and behavior, on the other hand the hippies and beat generation engagement were all against the modern destructive consumerist culture and the Vietnam war, most hippies were vegetarians or vegans, and the hippies are the ones to invent and celebrate Earth Day for the first time. To conclude both the hippies, and Beatniks were a result of the political sphere and decisions of America, and are a reaction against war, capitalism, and climate destruction.

Allen Ginsberg, at least for me, is the main figure of the beat generation, and his poetry is universal, prophetic, and timeless. Discovering the poems of Allen Ginsberg for the first time felt like salvation, like I was redeemed, and the fact that he and I don’t share the same culture, nor language just shows the universality of his poems, the generation described in his poems is not only the American generation of the fifties, it is every generation living under a capitalist, consumerist, violent, and unjust regime, it is every generation living In a culture of conservatism, homophobia, and exclusiveness in general.

In my country, Morocco, more young people are turning to the beatnik culture without knowing it, at least most of them don’t know it yet. First reason I see is the influence of the Beat Generation on American pop culture, music and film mainly, for example the movie Into The Wild is widely appreciated among youngsters, actually every year hundreds if not thousands of Moroccans hitchhike through the woods and mountains of Morocco, or go the Essaouira Festival, which is an a Gnaoua festival where you can notice the crazy long hair, and afro haircuts, hippie way of dressing, in addition to the drug use during the festival, two examples of the effect of the beat generation in Morocco is Anass Yakine, a young Moroccan who dropped out of university to spend two years walking around the country and who is now quite a popular figure in Morocco, second example is Djebli Club, an ecological commune located in Mokrisset, near ouazzane City, which has became last year a popular destination for people with alternative or beatnik minds. Second reason for turning to beatnik values is to escape injustice, violence, and intolerance committed both by the state, and the traditional Moroccan society.

Showing the influence of the Beat generation on American society is best done from a literary perspective. Allen Ginsberg, Jack Kerouac, Tennessee Williams, William Burroughs, William Carlos William, Jimi Hendrix and a lot of the modern and postmodern literary and artistic figures of America used to frequently visit Tangier, in fact Paul Bowles lived his last fifty years in Morocco, and he had a huge impact on a generation of writers and musicians, mainly on a distinguished Moroccan author Mohamed Choukri.

Mohamed Choukri in his first book “For Bread Alone”, which he wrote in jail and later on collaborated with Bowles to translate into English, tells us the story of his family who was driven by famine from Rif to Tangier when he was still a kid, to find himself later on homeless, a kid to face a big crowded city such as tangier. For Bread Alone depicts the underground or the rough aspect of the Moroccan society, it brings in controversial and sensitive topics that were for ages hidden under the rug, such as prostitution, homelessness, homosexuality, and famine, it also deals with the political context of the 40s and 50s. For Bread Alone was described by Tennessee Williams as, “A true story of human desperation, shattering in its impact”, in fact the two authors were close friends, and there is a collection of there correspondences available.

As Howl, when For Bread Alone was published in 1972 it was hugely attacked, specially after it was published in classical Arabic in 1982. You can compare Mohamed Choukri’s masterpiece to Jack Kerouac’s On The Road in terms of tone, both of them were written and expressed in slang and underground culture, both depict the immediacy of experience which carries with it moving emotions.

In the near future I will get into details and analysis of beat generation poetry and literature, and also some of the Moroccan postmodern writers as a sequel to this introductory article.




Thursday, 22 September 2016

September 22, 2016 0

Art : Introduction to Performance Art



Marina Abramovič, “Balkan Baroque”, 1997 Biennale di Venezia
Performance art is a genre of art where the body is used as a medium between the artist and audience instead of the Canvas and paint. It came as a reaction to Abstract Art, as well as the cruelty of the politics in the 20th century. Performance artists tend to provoke the minds of their audience, to positively engage them in the making of art to produce a shared experience, they want to create a collective therapy kind of the thing, but their art is no way therapeutic in first sight, it usually takes the audience to the extremes of physical and mental pain, it makes the audience question social norms in a jarring and provocative way. Performance art has been extremely attacked, the pretty consistent argument used against it functionality and form, that it lacks meaning, and it is not art since it doesn’t include traditional art material. Performance art goes hand in hand with the evolution of all cultures,  it was the art of the common people, lower class dedicated, people used it to express solidarity, union, and their mundane life, the form it took differed from story telling, Agora circles, dances, and folksongs, as well as signs tattooed in their bodies.

Performance art came to challenge the conventional forms of art. In a world of cruelty, concentration camps, and ideology driven wars I believe that painting can not fulfill the needs of the modern individual, paintings could not ignite a satisfactory reaction in the minds of the audience, it is so passive, but performance art’s main purpose if it had a define purpose would be to test the audience’s mental strength, because while you’re in a conventional art gallery art is separate both from the audience as a whole, and the artists themselves, it is very formalist, while in the performance you are witnessing the creation of something out of nothing, the audience collectively with the artist conquer the limits of reality, of physical endurance as well as the audience conquer hidden parts of their psyche, they reclaim control over their bodies.

One of the challenges of the modern world is being in the present moment, always wanting to be somewhere else, doing something else, talking to someone else people find themselves doing none of this, they feel disconnected from everyone the easier it gets to reach out others. If you check on goodreads more and more people are struggling with productivity and concentration, and that only shows the extent of how we no longer trust our bodies and our minds and we became depend on digital tools outside of our bodies to do this for us, the performance artist wants to transport you to a mental level, and a spiritual level that can only be reached when you are disconnected from everything, when you start looking inward first, when you test your mind and body, when you trust yourself and your surroundings. Being present is the focus of several performance artists, it makes you focus on things you esteem as trivial and see their beauty, it puts you face to face with things you normally don’t want to see.  The audience usually has no idea about what they will witness when going to a performance art show, so when they are physically there you experience a new unexpected thing that has the capacity to transform, for instance Marina Abramovic’s “The Artist is present”, where the audience was invited to have a one to one experience with the artist through the eyes, this seems banal, but in a modern world it is the one thing we lacked, this connected, they say the eyes are the mirror to the soul, and in this performance the audience wept, cried, and sobbed while sharing a certain unique connection with Marina, not as an Artist, but as a human being.

For instance, Shoot by Chris Burden. One of the most violent performance art shows, in a small audience Chris Burden was shot in the arm with a 22 long rifle, the audience was taken by surprise and shock; this shows the extremes artists took to evoke emotion in the audience. The shot was later on interpreted by the people who witnessed it as a representation of war, the consequence of brutal colonial politics, specially that it was performed in the context of Vietnam war, and some saw it as a representation of the artist as a martyr in the sake of freedom.

Poetry of the era was also influenced by the rise of Performance art, for example Beat Generation poetry and the playfulness of it, the link between the poet and the audience, and it was mostly performed in wide audiences in public spaces, for the common people, it was followed by debates, or conversations, and the audience felt the impact of the poem. We can also compare performance art with Theatre of the Oppressed (TO) where the audience was invited to include their experience and individuality in the making of the play.

My favorite performance art is Rhythm 0, by Marina Abramovic, where she put 72 objects in a table, ranging from the most peaceful to the most terminal of things, from a flower, a cup of water, to a gun, a knife, and the audience was allowed to do whatever they wanted with the object, which was the artist’s own body. Marina wanted to test the extent human can reach in terms of violence and cruelty if they had the chance to express them, and the result was horrific, she was all bruises after standing six hours, she was exposed and vulnerable. 

Wednesday, 21 September 2016

September 21, 2016 0

Alone Together. Our Souls At Night, by Kent Haruf


In the last few months, nights became unbearable, memories came crawling back and hit me harder every time, I cry myself to sleep, partly out of indecision, and disappointment. I am twenty one years old, and I feel like my life has ended, not because I am not depressed or anything, it’s the decay of loneliness, deep down I feel that it is only a matter of time and I will go back as I was before, so active, so productive, and social. I wanted to find solace in something, to get out all the heavy thoughts clouding up my consciousness, this time it is a book that I have had in my shelf for a while, but it never appealed to me as the book for my current mood until two days ago, this book is Our Souls At Night, by Kent Haruf. Honestly this book was everything I wanted it to be, it is tender, touching, emotional, and very consoling.


Our Souls At Night follows takes us into the lonely nights of two neighbors, Eddie and Louis who have been familiar with each others, but never were friends until this one night when Eddie came at Louis’ doorstep and asked him if he could share her bed, share their loneliness, to just lay there beside each others, drink some wine or beer and talk each other to sleep. Eddie has a son, and Louis has a daughter, but both of them live alone for years, both of them are haunted by memories, specially at night, you know how it feels to live backwards. Over the time they spend together, they pour their hearts out, they laugh, and they share some intimate regrets, piece of memories, and secrets.


No one expected Kent Haruf to write a book after he was diagnosed with Cancer, even his publisher was surprised, in fact the book was published posthumously in May, 2015. My favorite works of my favorite authors are mostly either their last published books, or their posthumous publication, take of instance Long Day’s Journey Into Night, by Eugene O’Neill; the books that witness the last chapter of an author are the most intimate, the most autobiographical in tone, very insightful. I usually don’t write about the authors, but we can’t ignore how important this book was for Kent, like O’Neill he dedicated the book to his wife, a gift full of love and nostalgia. Kent Haruf and his wife used to spend so many nights late just talking, and chatting.



And just like Kent Haruf, no one expected a revival or romance from Addie and Louis, they as many old people were expected to give in to aging, to die before they stopped breathing, but Addie and Louis both refused this role by sneaking around at night, and sleeping in the same bed, although the reader is confused about weather anything is going happen between them other than the wine and chats. I guess that at such an age what is more important than sexuality is companionship, sharing aloneness with someone else. Addie and Louis have very poignant memories of their spouses, for instance we could feel that the memory of Addie’s dead daughter never left her, and we can still see the shadow of Diane over Louis, and his regrets, so when they are together, the memories don’t go away, except that they are uttered, they are expressed out loud, they are shared. And nothing can be more soothing than a shared melancholic moment.


Although the book is very simple, short chapters and full of dialogue, the thing that renders the characters accessible to the reader, still the book has a layer of complication, a lost unknown past to the readers except for few pieces of memories, dots that we as reader have to connect, it is not necessary though to connect these memories together to enjoy the the experience, but I felt uncertain about their decisions, I felt that for instance Addie had this feeling of guilt, she feels guilty about her dead husband, her dead daughter, and her son, she feels obligated to help her grandson out of guilt mostly, actually her romance with Louis reconnects her with her family.


I am so excited for the Netflix adaptation of this book, I hope it will do it justice, and introduce more audience to the genius of Kent Haruf.


Our Souls At night is a lesson on love, a lesson on fidelity and rebellion.